Wow... today was a day of heavy conviction for me.
We had one of those fire-and-brimstone, "you're going straight to Hell because you listen to rock and roll music" preacher types come to our campus today. As I usually do, I joined the crowd, hoping to engage in discussion with those who were also there to listen.
In short time, a couple of people near me started talking to each other, and some dialogue broke out; I decided to join in as the group grew larger. At first, I stayed mostly silent, but interjected here and there. Soon, my points turned from being based in Scripture to being formed through logic. Soon after that, my arguments ceased altogether. The two other Christians who were in the group were able to answer objections in a reasonable manner, using much Scriptural support when appropriate; in short, they were "prepared to make a defense to anyone who ask[ed them] for a reason for the hope that is in [them]" (1 Peter 3:15). It quickly became evident to me (and perhaps, sadly, to others) that I could not do the same.
During this time, a friend of mine had called me, so afterwards, I returned her call, and told her about what had happened.
I told her, "I don't know. It just feels as if I've spent too much time... I don't know..."
To which she responded, "Preaching Calvinism, and not the Gospel?"
Ouch.
I say "ouch" not because I feel that this statement was unwarranted, but - on the contrary - because this has been weighing heavily on my heart lately. And I realized today that, if pressed, I would be able to give a more intelligible and convincing argument for the tenants of Reformed doctrine than for the basis of my own faith. This should not be so!!
This is not to say that God is "in need" of our help to defend His holy name, nor that apologetics is the only way to evangelize (certainly not!), nor even that we should have an answer for every question that is asked, but when we are told in Scripture to "always be prepared to make a defense"... shouldn't we be prepared with something?
Also, this is not to say that I believe that studying theology is wrong (again, certainly not!), but as I think back on my efforts spent in seeking out discussion of my faith recently, I am saddened that I have spent more time trying to reveal to other Christians the Scriptural and logical evidence for what I believe to be certain theological truths (as wonderful a blessing as they may be!) than pointing unbelievers toward the glory of Christ and His sacrifice on the cross.
Thankfully, we serve a God of absolute grace, who is slow to anger and rich in love (Psalm 145:8). He is also generous enough to gently rebuke us when we err, compassionately revealing to us our sinfulness, that He might purify our hearts. Therefore, I do not cringe at this conviction, but rather embrace it, and thank God for it.
Please be praying for me, that God would be working His refining fire in me, cleansing my heart of all unloving and unrighteous grime that might be lining it. And pray that He would glorify Himself in my life!
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
i really appreciate your honesty in this post.
nat and i were talking about the importance of understanding doctrine and theology after the sermon on sunday. with some theological points, i was on the side of "is it really that important?". nat responded that maybe not when we first come to know Christ, but as we mature, it does.
with this in mind, i think you're right in that we should share Christ and the Gospel and not get hung up about selling certain theological points (especially with nonbelievers). however, i think there is a time and a place to correct believers of unsound doctrine too to help them mature.
Thanks for the thoughts and encouragement, Ramona!
Yeah, I was talking about all of this with some friends yesterday, and I also said what Nat did. Basically, if milk is to be fed, we help with the bottle, but if meat needs to start entering the diet, we should help cut it up. Inevitably, we are going to come across these doctrinal points in the process, and if things pop up which are not Scripturally based... well, we should say something, right?
But how far should that extend? I agree that these are not topics to discuss with unbelievers (unless they ask our views on the matters), because they have no relevance to their attaining salvation. But beyond that... it starts to get a bit hazy for me.
i do think we should say something if some doctrine isn't Scripturally based. how far we should pursue it, i think gets hazy. i think it's based on the individual and the "softness" of their heart to receive such truths. if it's hardened, we can present the truth, but i don't feel it does much good to push more than that--in my experience it turns mostly into arguments. if it's soft, then i think there can be more of the "cutting up meat" that you spoke of. :)
Post a Comment